- #AUDACITY NEW COMMUNITY OWNER IS IN CODE#
- #AUDACITY NEW COMMUNITY OWNER IS IN PS4#
- #AUDACITY NEW COMMUNITY OWNER IS IN PS3#
MuseGroup can file a civil lawsuit but (I think?) losing a civil lawsuit probably wouldn't affect anyone's immigration status. I'm not a lawyer and a lot of this depends on Canadian law which I definitely don't know anything about. Tl dr: Immigration law is very complex, timelines for parallel actions are often not synchronized in any helpful way, and outcomes are very difficult to predict.
#AUDACITY NEW COMMUNITY OWNER IS IN PS3#
More relevantly he did survive a lawsuit from Sony related to hacking the PS3 and was involved in lengthy proceedings accused of CFAA and DMCA violations so he likely has some first-hand knowledge of the nuances of relevant federal laws.
#AUDACITY NEW COMMUNITY OWNER IS IN PS4#
Marcan is not the alleged violator, he is an uninvolved third party observer who, in an unrelated tangent, happened to have ported Linux to PS4 and is currently porting Linux to M1 MacBooks. I don’t know I haven’t looked at any cases.Īlso, I think you may have some of the characters mixed up. It may be strict liability instead? At least as worded. The NY law you cited doesn’t seem to have anything about “intent” so it’s not obvious that you’d have to show MuseGroup believed there was no piracy. It’s definitely not clear that he lacks the legal right to abstain from deleting the GitHub repository which does not contain copyrighted materials. Xmader may be legally required to not share copyrighted materials on IPFS.
#AUDACITY NEW COMMUNITY OWNER IS IN CODE#
The pirated materials do not exist in the GitHub repository, that is separately and independently stored on IPFS (his GitHub repository is the source code for essentially a qBittorrent app or a torrent tracker). Muse is asking Xmader to delete his GitHub repository. I like your assessment, that makes sense to me and I’ll probably use it going forward. Were he deported to China, who knows how he may be received.” This becomes even further complicated given another repo of his - Fuck XXQG which is highly critical of the Chinese government. If found in violation of laws, residency may be revoked and he may be deported to his home country. As a guest in his current country, his residency status is predicated on a number of conditions, one of which is not violating the law. > “Upon further investigation, it became clear that is a Chinese national, but not resident in China. Could anyone explain how Daniel’s comments aren’t potentially illegal “blackmail”? To a layperson it really sounded like Muse Group’s leadership resorted to blackmail and then backpedalled after marcan called them out on it.Ĭalifornia’s statute for this even specifically calls out bringing up someone’s immigration status.
0 kommentar(er)
